Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Rectification proceedings invoked to recompute depreciation were held beyond the scope of the apparent mistake remedy because such powers address only manifest errors on the record and not detailed re-assessment; consequence: rectification to re-compute depreciation is invalid. Reopening of assessment was invalidated where the reasons and supervisory approval relied on incorrect AY references and unchecked figures, demonstrating non-application of mind and reliance on irrelevant information; consequence: the reopening notice vitiated for want of proper jurisdictional foundation and in favour of the assessee.
Rectification proceedings invoked to recompute depreciation were held beyond the scope of the apparent mistake remedy because such powers address only manifest errors on the record and not detailed re-assessment; consequence: rectification to re-compute depreciation is invalid. Reopening of assessment was invalidated where the reasons and supervisory approval relied on incorrect AY references and unchecked figures, demonstrating non-application of mind and reliance on irrelevant information; consequence: the reopening notice vitiated for want of proper jurisdictional foundation and in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.