Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Rectification proceedings invoked to recompute depreciation were held beyond the scope of the apparent mistake remedy because such powers address only manifest errors on the record and not detailed re-assessment; consequence: rectification to re-compute depreciation is invalid. Reopening of assessment was invalidated where the reasons and supervisory approval relied on incorrect AY references and unchecked figures, demonstrating non-application of mind and reliance on irrelevant information; consequence: the reopening notice vitiated for want of proper jurisdictional foundation and in favour of the assessee.
Rectification proceedings invoked to recompute depreciation were held beyond the scope of the apparent mistake remedy because such powers address only manifest errors on the record and not detailed re-assessment; consequence: rectification to re-compute depreciation is invalid. Reopening of assessment was invalidated where the reasons and supervisory approval relied on incorrect AY references and unchecked figures, demonstrating non-application of mind and reliance on irrelevant information; consequence: the reopening notice vitiated for want of proper jurisdictional foundation and in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.