Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Benami transactions include transfers where the consideration provider is fictitious or untraceable; inability to identify the beneficial owner does not warrant discharge. Issue one: whether partners are vicariously liable managing partner signed accounts and controlled firm affairs, establishing prima facie knowledge and consent, therefore discharge was rightly refused. Issue two: whether a dormant partner can be held vicariously liable complaint lacked specific averments showing she was in charge or responsible as required by the statutory twin requirements, so the order against her is set aside, subject to reopening if cogent material is later produced.
Benami transactions include transfers where the consideration provider is fictitious or untraceable; inability to identify the beneficial owner does not warrant discharge. Issue one: whether partners are vicariously liable managing partner signed accounts and controlled firm affairs, establishing prima facie knowledge and consent, therefore discharge was rightly refused. Issue two: whether a dormant partner can be held vicariously liable complaint lacked specific averments showing she was in charge or responsible as required by the statutory twin requirements, so the order against her is set aside, subject to reopening if cogent material is later produced.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
