Charity-run tree plantation and maintenance for environmental preservation qualifies as "charitable activity", making supplies GST-exempt under Notifi...
Drawings/designs supply and erection supervision fees from German contractor: designs non-taxable; supervision taxed as FTS/PE depending on six-month ...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7621 to 7640 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dispute concerns classification of imported salvaged/broken...
Classification of imported salvaged shaft pieces as ship parts confirmed, reassessment time-barred and appeal allowed restoring original classification.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Dispute concerns classification of imported salvaged/broken shaft pieces and whether re-classification and recovery of differential duty was time-barred and justified by alleged suppression. The commercial invoice and SAFTA certificate declared the goods as parts of ship under CTH 7326 9090, and the goods, after salvage, lost original identity and assumed character of iron and steel ship parts, meriting classification under that heading; consequently the proposed change lacked sustainable reasons. There was no evidence of concealment warranting extended limitation; matter was revenue neutral. The impugned reassessment was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Dispute concerns classification of imported salvaged/broken shaft pieces and whether re-classification and recovery of differential duty was time-barred and justified by alleged suppression. The commercial invoice and SAFTA certificate declared the goods as parts of ship under CTH 7326 9090, and the goods, after salvage, lost original identity and assumed character of iron and steel ship parts, meriting classification under that heading; consequently the proposed change lacked sustainable reasons. There was no evidence of concealment warranting extended limitation; matter was revenue neutral. The impugned reassessment was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.