Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dispute concerns classification of imported salvaged/broken...
Classification of imported salvaged shaft pieces as ship parts confirmed, reassessment time-barred and appeal allowed restoring original classification.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Dispute concerns classification of imported salvaged/broken shaft pieces and whether re-classification and recovery of differential duty was time-barred and justified by alleged suppression. The commercial invoice and SAFTA certificate declared the goods as parts of ship under CTH 7326 9090, and the goods, after salvage, lost original identity and assumed character of iron and steel ship parts, meriting classification under that heading; consequently the proposed change lacked sustainable reasons. There was no evidence of concealment warranting extended limitation; matter was revenue neutral. The impugned reassessment was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Dispute concerns classification of imported salvaged/broken shaft pieces and whether re-classification and recovery of differential duty was time-barred and justified by alleged suppression. The commercial invoice and SAFTA certificate declared the goods as parts of ship under CTH 7326 9090, and the goods, after salvage, lost original identity and assumed character of iron and steel ship parts, meriting classification under that heading; consequently the proposed change lacked sustainable reasons. There was no evidence of concealment warranting extended limitation; matter was revenue neutral. The impugned reassessment was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
