Mark-to-Market losses on principal-protected debentures are deductible as business expenditure when the obligation is crystallized under mercantile ac...
Deferred Payment of Customs Duty extended to Eligible Manufacturer Importers with electronic registration and ICEGATE authentication for conditional c...
Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5821 to 5840 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dispute concerns classification of imported salvaged/broken...
Classification of imported salvaged shaft pieces as ship parts confirmed, reassessment time-barred and appeal allowed restoring original classification.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Dispute concerns classification of imported salvaged/broken shaft pieces and whether re-classification and recovery of differential duty was time-barred and justified by alleged suppression. The commercial invoice and SAFTA certificate declared the goods as parts of ship under CTH 7326 9090, and the goods, after salvage, lost original identity and assumed character of iron and steel ship parts, meriting classification under that heading; consequently the proposed change lacked sustainable reasons. There was no evidence of concealment warranting extended limitation; matter was revenue neutral. The impugned reassessment was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Dispute concerns classification of imported salvaged/broken shaft pieces and whether re-classification and recovery of differential duty was time-barred and justified by alleged suppression. The commercial invoice and SAFTA certificate declared the goods as parts of ship under CTH 7326 9090, and the goods, after salvage, lost original identity and assumed character of iron and steel ship parts, meriting classification under that heading; consequently the proposed change lacked sustainable reasons. There was no evidence of concealment warranting extended limitation; matter was revenue neutral. The impugned reassessment was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.