Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Service tax demand was challenged on the ground that the Show Cause Notice issued solely on the basis of CBDT/Income Tax data lacked independent verification and breached principles of natural justice; consequently the demand was set aside. The failure to undertake mandatory pre-Show Cause Notice consultation for demands exceeding the prescribed threshold was held to render the notice legally unsustainable, resulting in quashing of demand. Because the substantive demand failed, interest, penalty and late fees linked to the alleged service tax liability were also held not leviable and were set aside.
Service tax demand was challenged on the ground that the Show Cause Notice issued solely on the basis of CBDT/Income Tax data lacked independent verification and breached principles of natural justice; consequently the demand was set aside. The failure to undertake mandatory pre-Show Cause Notice consultation for demands exceeding the prescribed threshold was held to render the notice legally unsustainable, resulting in quashing of demand. Because the substantive demand failed, interest, penalty and late fees linked to the alleged service tax liability were also held not leviable and were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
