Tax determination against deceased proprietor invalid where no notice to legal representative; appeal rejected without addressing jurisdictional defec...
Revocation of GST registration and permission to file blocked returns; conditional defreezing of bank accounts after security and instalment applicati...
Right to access seized electronic evidence: impugned adjudication treated as additional show cause notice, remand for fresh hearing and return of mate...
Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6481 to 6500 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Availability of CENVAT credit after omission of Rule 12B and...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Availability of CENVAT credit after omission of Rule 12B and validity of an addendum to a show cause notice were decided. The tribunal held that procedural regime under Rule 12B enabled textile processors to avail CENVAT credit subject to prescribed documentation and compliance, and the appellants were eligible for credit for the disputed period. An addendum issued more than two years after the original SCN introduced new grounds and was not a continuance of the original allegations; such fresh grounds require separate adjudication under the procedure for separate notices. The addendum was time-barred and unsustainable, resulting in setting aside of the impugned order.
Availability of CENVAT credit after omission of Rule 12B and validity of an addendum to a show cause notice were decided. The tribunal held that procedural regime under Rule 12B enabled textile processors to avail CENVAT credit subject to prescribed documentation and compliance, and the appellants were eligible for credit for the disputed period. An addendum issued more than two years after the original SCN introduced new grounds and was not a continuance of the original allegations; such fresh grounds require separate adjudication under the procedure for separate notices. The addendum was time-barred and unsustainable, resulting in setting aside of the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
