Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Issue: Whether blocking electronic input tax credit under Rule 86A was predicated on an independent, reasoned satisfaction or on a mechanical/borrowed conclusion. Reasoning: The court held that Rule 86A requires an independent application of mind and a speaking order; reliance on the Board's Circular dated 02.11.2021 does not permit a mere mechanical exercise or borrowed satisfaction. Outcome: The tax authority was directed to pass a fresh reasoned speaking order complying with Rule 86A, and the writ was disposed. - HC
Issue: Whether blocking electronic input tax credit under Rule 86A was predicated on an independent, reasoned satisfaction or on a mechanical/borrowed conclusion. Reasoning: The court held that Rule 86A requires an independent application of mind and a speaking order; reliance on the Board's Circular dated 02.11.2021 does not permit a mere mechanical exercise or borrowed satisfaction. Outcome: The tax authority was directed to pass a fresh reasoned speaking order complying with Rule 86A, and the writ was disposed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.