Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issue: Whether a Revisional order under section 263 can direct initiation of penalty under section 271E absent the Assessing Officer's satisfaction in the assessment order. Reasoning: Relying on the Supreme Court principle that initiation/levy of penalty under s.271E requires satisfaction recorded in the assessment, the Revisional Authority erred in treating penalty initiation as independent of AO's satisfaction and in distinguishing earlier High Court precedent. Outcome: The section 263 order directing initiation of penalty under s.271E was unsustainable and is set aside; appeal allowed. - ITAT
Issue: Whether a Revisional order under section 263 can direct initiation of penalty under section 271E absent the Assessing Officer's satisfaction in the assessment order. Reasoning: Relying on the Supreme Court principle that initiation/levy of penalty under s.271E requires satisfaction recorded in the assessment, the Revisional Authority erred in treating penalty initiation as independent of AO's satisfaction and in distinguishing earlier High Court precedent. Outcome: The section 263 order directing initiation of penalty under s.271E was unsustainable and is set aside; appeal allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.