Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issue: Whether a Revisional order under section 263 can direct initiation of penalty under section 271E absent the Assessing Officer's satisfaction in the assessment order. Reasoning: Relying on the Supreme Court principle that initiation/levy of penalty under s.271E requires satisfaction recorded in the assessment, the Revisional Authority erred in treating penalty initiation as independent of AO's satisfaction and in distinguishing earlier High Court precedent. Outcome: The section 263 order directing initiation of penalty under s.271E was unsustainable and is set aside; appeal allowed. - ITAT
Issue: Whether a Revisional order under section 263 can direct initiation of penalty under section 271E absent the Assessing Officer's satisfaction in the assessment order. Reasoning: Relying on the Supreme Court principle that initiation/levy of penalty under s.271E requires satisfaction recorded in the assessment, the Revisional Authority erred in treating penalty initiation as independent of AO's satisfaction and in distinguishing earlier High Court precedent. Outcome: The section 263 order directing initiation of penalty under s.271E was unsustainable and is set aside; appeal allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
