Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6601 to 6620 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issue: Whether a Revisional order under section 263 can direct initiation of penalty under section 271E absent the Assessing Officer's satisfaction in the assessment order. Reasoning: Relying on the Supreme Court principle that initiation/levy of penalty under s.271E requires satisfaction recorded in the assessment, the Revisional Authority erred in treating penalty initiation as independent of AO's satisfaction and in distinguishing earlier High Court precedent. Outcome: The section 263 order directing initiation of penalty under s.271E was unsustainable and is set aside; appeal allowed. - ITAT
Issue: Whether a Revisional order under section 263 can direct initiation of penalty under section 271E absent the Assessing Officer's satisfaction in the assessment order. Reasoning: Relying on the Supreme Court principle that initiation/levy of penalty under s.271E requires satisfaction recorded in the assessment, the Revisional Authority erred in treating penalty initiation as independent of AO's satisfaction and in distinguishing earlier High Court precedent. Outcome: The section 263 order directing initiation of penalty under s.271E was unsustainable and is set aside; appeal allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
