Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Dominant issue: Whether the assessing officer's allowance of deduction under s.80P(2)(a)(i)/80P(2)(d) for interest and dividend from co-operative banks was an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction warranting revision under s.263. Reasoning: The AO made specific enquiries, verified records, and adopted a plausible, debatable view; the issue is covered by an earlier consistent finding favourable to the assessee. Outcome: The revisionary jurisdiction under s.263 cannot be invoked as the AO's order, though potentially prejudicial to Revenue, is not erroneous; appeal allowed for assessee. - ITAT
Dominant issue: Whether the assessing officer's allowance of deduction under s.80P(2)(a)(i)/80P(2)(d) for interest and dividend from co-operative banks was an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction warranting revision under s.263. Reasoning: The AO made specific enquiries, verified records, and adopted a plausible, debatable view; the issue is covered by an earlier consistent finding favourable to the assessee. Outcome: The revisionary jurisdiction under s.263 cannot be invoked as the AO's order, though potentially prejudicial to Revenue, is not erroneous; appeal allowed for assessee. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
