Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Whether Article 20(2) bars prosecution: Article 20(2) protects against double jeopardy only after prior trial has concluded in conviction or acquittal; where the earlier ECIR's trial is pending and alleged offences are continuing, the constitutional bar is not attracted - prosecution may proceed. Applicability of s.45 PMLA "twin conditions": statutory requirement to record satisfaction on reasonable grounds overrides Cr.P.C.; given substantial unaccounted deficit and evidence of post-2017 layering, the court could not be satisfied the accused were not guilty, precluding grant of regular bail - bail refused. - HC
Whether Article 20(2) bars prosecution: Article 20(2) protects against double jeopardy only after prior trial has concluded in conviction or acquittal; where the earlier ECIR's trial is pending and alleged offences are continuing, the constitutional bar is not attracted - prosecution may proceed. Applicability of s.45 PMLA "twin conditions": statutory requirement to record satisfaction on reasonable grounds overrides Cr.P.C.; given substantial unaccounted deficit and evidence of post-2017 layering, the court could not be satisfied the accused were not guilty, precluding grant of regular bail - bail refused. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.