Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Whether services rendered were taxable: Tribunal held that training for competitive exams, given by an organization operating for bona fide charitable purposes and registered under s.12AA, did not constitute "commercial coaching" because receipts were applied to charitable upliftment and revenue did not dispute charitable activities - training not taxable. Renting of immovable property was not held to be a taxable service where absence of fixed tariff, use of premises for community programmes, and application of receipts to charitable objects negated a commercial renting service - renting not taxable. Miscellaneous receipts lacked cogent evidentiary basis to levy duty and were shown to fund charity - not taxable. Invocation of extended limitation was unsustainable in absence of malafide or suppression. Impugned order quashed and appeal allowed. - CESTAT
Whether services rendered were taxable: Tribunal held that training for competitive exams, given by an organization operating for bona fide charitable purposes and registered under s.12AA, did not constitute "commercial coaching" because receipts were applied to charitable upliftment and revenue did not dispute charitable activities - training not taxable. Renting of immovable property was not held to be a taxable service where absence of fixed tariff, use of premises for community programmes, and application of receipts to charitable objects negated a commercial renting service - renting not taxable. Miscellaneous receipts lacked cogent evidentiary basis to levy duty and were shown to fund charity - not taxable. Invocation of extended limitation was unsustainable in absence of malafide or suppression. Impugned order quashed and appeal allowed. - CESTAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.