Prior Sanction Requirement: absence of prescribed approval invalidates reassessment notice; limitation also bars notice if escaped income below thresh...
Eligibility for exemption depends on strict construction of the product description; reapers without binder are ineligible, but confiscation and penal...
Customs jurisdiction defined for Principal Commissioner, Vishakhapatnam, covering specified ports, districts and India's adjacent EEZ; effective on pu...
The sole issue is validity of reassessment where notices under section 143(2) were issued manually without a computer-generated DIN. Relying on the CBDT circular making DIN mandatory from 01.10.2019 and permitting manual issue only with recorded reasons and prior written approval of CCIT/DGIT, the tribunal found Revenue could not produce recorded reasons or prior approval. Consequently the 143(2) communications are invalid and deemed never issued; assumption of jurisdiction under section 148 is vitiated and reassessment is quashed as void ab initio. - ITAT
The sole issue is validity of reassessment where notices under section 143(2) were issued manually without a computer-generated DIN. Relying on the CBDT circular making DIN mandatory from 01.10.2019 and permitting manual issue only with recorded reasons and prior written approval of CCIT/DGIT, the tribunal found Revenue could not produce recorded reasons or prior approval. Consequently the 143(2) communications are invalid and deemed never issued; assumption of jurisdiction under section 148 is vitiated and reassessment is quashed as void ab initio. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.