International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Whether Section 73 proceedings can be continued after the death...
Continuation of Section 73 service-tax proceedings after provider's death (construing s.65(7)) - held to abate; posthumous OIO and recoveries invalidated
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Whether Section 73 proceedings can be continued after the death of an individual service provider: construing Section 65(7) and the term "person" (and the statutory use of "includes"), the court held that a legal heir or individual successor does not automatically become the "person liable to pay service tax" nor qualifies as the deceased's "agent"; machinery provisions cannot create substantive liability. Consequently, proceedings under Section 73 abated on the death of the provider, an Order-in-Original issued posthumously is untenable, and consequent recovery actions are invalidated - the impugned OIO and recovery direction set aside. - HC
Whether Section 73 proceedings can be continued after the death of an individual service provider: construing Section 65(7) and the term "person" (and the statutory use of "includes"), the court held that a legal heir or individual successor does not automatically become the "person liable to pay service tax" nor qualifies as the deceased's "agent"; machinery provisions cannot create substantive liability. Consequently, proceedings under Section 73 abated on the death of the provider, an Order-in-Original issued posthumously is untenable, and consequent recovery actions are invalidated - the impugned OIO and recovery direction set aside. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.