Tax determination against deceased proprietor invalid where no notice to legal representative; appeal rejected without addressing jurisdictional defec...
Revocation of GST registration and permission to file blocked returns; conditional defreezing of bank accounts after security and instalment applicati...
Right to access seized electronic evidence: impugned adjudication treated as additional show cause notice, remand for fresh hearing and return of mate...
Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6481 to 6500 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether Section 73 proceedings can be continued after the death...
Continuation of Section 73 service-tax proceedings after provider's death (construing s.65(7)) - held to abate; posthumous OIO and recoveries invalidated
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Whether Section 73 proceedings can be continued after the death of an individual service provider: construing Section 65(7) and the term "person" (and the statutory use of "includes"), the court held that a legal heir or individual successor does not automatically become the "person liable to pay service tax" nor qualifies as the deceased's "agent"; machinery provisions cannot create substantive liability. Consequently, proceedings under Section 73 abated on the death of the provider, an Order-in-Original issued posthumously is untenable, and consequent recovery actions are invalidated - the impugned OIO and recovery direction set aside. - HC
Whether Section 73 proceedings can be continued after the death of an individual service provider: construing Section 65(7) and the term "person" (and the statutory use of "includes"), the court held that a legal heir or individual successor does not automatically become the "person liable to pay service tax" nor qualifies as the deceased's "agent"; machinery provisions cannot create substantive liability. Consequently, proceedings under Section 73 abated on the death of the provider, an Order-in-Original issued posthumously is untenable, and consequent recovery actions are invalidated - the impugned OIO and recovery direction set aside. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.