Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitat...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5641 to 5660 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether Section 73 proceedings can be continued after the death...
Continuation of Section 73 service-tax proceedings after provider's death (construing s.65(7)) - held to abate; posthumous OIO and recoveries invalidated
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Whether Section 73 proceedings can be continued after the death of an individual service provider: construing Section 65(7) and the term "person" (and the statutory use of "includes"), the court held that a legal heir or individual successor does not automatically become the "person liable to pay service tax" nor qualifies as the deceased's "agent"; machinery provisions cannot create substantive liability. Consequently, proceedings under Section 73 abated on the death of the provider, an Order-in-Original issued posthumously is untenable, and consequent recovery actions are invalidated - the impugned OIO and recovery direction set aside. - HC
Whether Section 73 proceedings can be continued after the death of an individual service provider: construing Section 65(7) and the term "person" (and the statutory use of "includes"), the court held that a legal heir or individual successor does not automatically become the "person liable to pay service tax" nor qualifies as the deceased's "agent"; machinery provisions cannot create substantive liability. Consequently, proceedings under Section 73 abated on the death of the provider, an Order-in-Original issued posthumously is untenable, and consequent recovery actions are invalidated - the impugned OIO and recovery direction set aside. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.