Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dominant issue: whether capital gains on sale of shares held by Mauritius-incorporated companies are taxable in India given residence, treaty relief and anti-avoidance rules. The Court found prima facie that effective management/residence and Article 13's scope were contestable and that the transactions lacked commercial substance; GAAR (and alternatively JAAR/substance-over-form) could pierce the structure. Reasoning: documentary timeline, board approvals post cut-off, contra-factual tax positions and burden shift under Section 96(2) established a prima facie tax-avoidance scheme. Outcome: applications to AAR were correctly rejected under proviso (iii) to Section 245R(2); capital gains on transfers after 01.04.2017 are taxable in India and Chapter X-A applies. - SC
Dominant issue: whether capital gains on sale of shares held by Mauritius-incorporated companies are taxable in India given residence, treaty relief and anti-avoidance rules. The Court found prima facie that effective management/residence and Article 13's scope were contestable and that the transactions lacked commercial substance; GAAR (and alternatively JAAR/substance-over-form) could pierce the structure. Reasoning: documentary timeline, board approvals post cut-off, contra-factual tax positions and burden shift under Section 96(2) established a prima facie tax-avoidance scheme. Outcome: applications to AAR were correctly rejected under proviso (iii) to Section 245R(2); capital gains on transfers after 01.04.2017 are taxable in India and Chapter X-A applies. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
