Expenditure tied to investments yielding exempt income restricted to attributable costs; broader disallowance disallowed and adjustments to WDV and mi...
Admissibility of Investigative Statements invalidated reliance on coerced emails and valuation redetermination, resulting in set aside of penalties an...
Classification of printed technical documents: specific Chapter 49.01 entry prevails, enabling claimed customs exemptions for imported manuals and rep...
Attachment of Pre Offence Mortgaged Property remains possible under PMLA; secured creditors may pursue statutory claim and seek auction with undertaki...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5501 to 5520 of 96509 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Ex-post-facto approval by the competent authority regularized prior failure to obtain prior RBI approval for the share transfer, nullifying contraventions under the FEMA transfer/issue regulations as against the two appellants - penalties imposed on those appellants are set aside. Separately, on the distinct issue of alleged contravention of Section 3(c) of FEMA, the appellant failed to establish lawful source of funds; the ex-post-facto approval did not relieve compliance with other FEMA conditions, therefore the penalty for the Section 3(c) breach is sustained against that appellant. The pre-deposit previously directed shall be adjusted against the upheld penalty. - AT
Ex-post-facto approval by the competent authority regularized prior failure to obtain prior RBI approval for the share transfer, nullifying contraventions under the FEMA transfer/issue regulations as against the two appellants - penalties imposed on those appellants are set aside. Separately, on the distinct issue of alleged contravention of Section 3(c) of FEMA, the appellant failed to establish lawful source of funds; the ex-post-facto approval did not relieve compliance with other FEMA conditions, therefore the penalty for the Section 3(c) breach is sustained against that appellant. The pre-deposit previously directed shall be adjusted against the upheld penalty. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.