Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Whether proceedings under Section 153C were validly initiated: Court held the foundational statutory prerequisite-creation of an asset under the scheme and the fourth proviso to Section 153A-appears absent because the ledger entries relate to expenditure and TDS was deducted, undermining the jurisdictional basis for a Section 153C notice; outcome: petitioner has a plausible ground to oppose the proceedings. Direction to assessing officer to decide petitioner's objections and pass a reasoned order within the specified short period, with communication to petitioner. - HC
Whether proceedings under Section 153C were validly initiated: Court held the foundational statutory prerequisite-creation of an asset under the scheme and the fourth proviso to Section 153A-appears absent because the ledger entries relate to expenditure and TDS was deducted, undermining the jurisdictional basis for a Section 153C notice; outcome: petitioner has a plausible ground to oppose the proceedings. Direction to assessing officer to decide petitioner's objections and pass a reasoned order within the specified short period, with communication to petitioner. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.