Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Unexplained cash deposits during demonetisation: the Tribunal held that cash deposited in the bank derived from prior household savings and recorded in the assessee's books, and once receipts are reflected in books and accepted by the assessing officer, the onus to further explain does not sustain an addition under section 69A; consequence - addition under s.69A deleted. Double taxation and prior acceptance of receipts: re-taxing the same receipts under s.69A would amount to double taxation, therefore such duplicate addition is impermissible - consequence - deleted. Evidentiary deficiencies: poor documentary compliance justified partial relief; consequence - a compensatory addition of 10% of Rs.29,60,000 (Rs.2,96,000) sustained. Section 115BBE: deposits held to arise from business and thus not liable to flat rate under s.115BBE; consequence - tax the Rs.2,96,000 at normal rates by the AO. - ITAT
Unexplained cash deposits during demonetisation: the Tribunal held that cash deposited in the bank derived from prior household savings and recorded in the assessee's books, and once receipts are reflected in books and accepted by the assessing officer, the onus to further explain does not sustain an addition under section 69A; consequence - addition under s.69A deleted. Double taxation and prior acceptance of receipts: re-taxing the same receipts under s.69A would amount to double taxation, therefore such duplicate addition is impermissible - consequence - deleted. Evidentiary deficiencies: poor documentary compliance justified partial relief; consequence - a compensatory addition of 10% of Rs.29,60,000 (Rs.2,96,000) sustained. Section 115BBE: deposits held to arise from business and thus not liable to flat rate under s.115BBE; consequence - tax the Rs.2,96,000 at normal rates by the AO. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.