Mark-to-Market losses on principal-protected debentures are deductible as business expenditure when the obligation is crystallized under mercantile ac...
Deferred Payment of Customs Duty extended to Eligible Manufacturer Importers with electronic registration and ICEGATE authentication for conditional c...
Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5821 to 5840 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unexplained cash deposits during demonetisation: the Tribunal held that cash deposited in the bank derived from prior household savings and recorded in the assessee's books, and once receipts are reflected in books and accepted by the assessing officer, the onus to further explain does not sustain an addition under section 69A; consequence - addition under s.69A deleted. Double taxation and prior acceptance of receipts: re-taxing the same receipts under s.69A would amount to double taxation, therefore such duplicate addition is impermissible - consequence - deleted. Evidentiary deficiencies: poor documentary compliance justified partial relief; consequence - a compensatory addition of 10% of Rs.29,60,000 (Rs.2,96,000) sustained. Section 115BBE: deposits held to arise from business and thus not liable to flat rate under s.115BBE; consequence - tax the Rs.2,96,000 at normal rates by the AO. - ITAT
Unexplained cash deposits during demonetisation: the Tribunal held that cash deposited in the bank derived from prior household savings and recorded in the assessee's books, and once receipts are reflected in books and accepted by the assessing officer, the onus to further explain does not sustain an addition under section 69A; consequence - addition under s.69A deleted. Double taxation and prior acceptance of receipts: re-taxing the same receipts under s.69A would amount to double taxation, therefore such duplicate addition is impermissible - consequence - deleted. Evidentiary deficiencies: poor documentary compliance justified partial relief; consequence - a compensatory addition of 10% of Rs.29,60,000 (Rs.2,96,000) sustained. Section 115BBE: deposits held to arise from business and thus not liable to flat rate under s.115BBE; consequence - tax the Rs.2,96,000 at normal rates by the AO. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
