Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Dominant issue 1: genuineness of transportation expenses - tribunal found the asserted MOU predating the assessee's incorporation was inconsistent and unexplained, and absence of reference to prior transportation in the subcontract reinforced revenue's conclusion that the MOU was fabricated; consequence: transportation claim of Rs.41,48,000 disallowed. Dominant issue 2: liability for deductions labeled "labour cess" and copy charges - under Clause 11 of the subcontract the authority's statutory deductions were payable by the sub-contractor (party of the second part), not the assessee; consequence: the assessee's claim for those subcontract expenses was disallowed. - ITAT
Dominant issue 1: genuineness of transportation expenses - tribunal found the asserted MOU predating the assessee's incorporation was inconsistent and unexplained, and absence of reference to prior transportation in the subcontract reinforced revenue's conclusion that the MOU was fabricated; consequence: transportation claim of Rs.41,48,000 disallowed. Dominant issue 2: liability for deductions labeled "labour cess" and copy charges - under Clause 11 of the subcontract the authority's statutory deductions were payable by the sub-contractor (party of the second part), not the assessee; consequence: the assessee's claim for those subcontract expenses was disallowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.