Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Where a statutory appellate forum exists but was non-functional, the court permits writ jurisdiction to prevent remedilessness; however, once the forum is constituted, the writ court must decline relief and ensure statutory conditions for appeal (including pre-deposit requirements) are strictly observed. The petition challenging an order is therefore held non-maintainable before the writ court now that the appellate forum functions; the petitioner is directed to comply with sub-section (8) of Section 112 (pre-deposit the required amount) and file the appeal within the prescribed extended timeline, and the writ is disposed of accordingly. - HC
Where a statutory appellate forum exists but was non-functional, the court permits writ jurisdiction to prevent remedilessness; however, once the forum is constituted, the writ court must decline relief and ensure statutory conditions for appeal (including pre-deposit requirements) are strictly observed. The petition challenging an order is therefore held non-maintainable before the writ court now that the appellate forum functions; the petitioner is directed to comply with sub-section (8) of Section 112 (pre-deposit the required amount) and file the appeal within the prescribed extended timeline, and the writ is disposed of accordingly. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
