Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Where an alternative statutory appellate forum exists, the court held that a writ is maintainable only if that forum is non-functional or not constituted; conversely, where the forum is functional the writ court must refrain from adjudicating and insist on compliance with statutory preconditions for appeal. The court applied this principle to require strict observance of the pre-deposit obligation under Section 112(8) of the GST statute and ordered the petitioner to make the deposit (if not already made) and to file the appeal electronically within the timeline prescribed in the GSTAT e-Filing User Advisor; petition disposed. - HC
Where an alternative statutory appellate forum exists, the court held that a writ is maintainable only if that forum is non-functional or not constituted; conversely, where the forum is functional the writ court must refrain from adjudicating and insist on compliance with statutory preconditions for appeal. The court applied this principle to require strict observance of the pre-deposit obligation under Section 112(8) of the GST statute and ordered the petitioner to make the deposit (if not already made) and to file the appeal electronically within the timeline prescribed in the GSTAT e-Filing User Advisor; petition disposed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.