Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Whether penalty under section 272A(1)(d) could be sustained where statutory notices under section 142(1) were served to an email ID other than the assessee's registered email. Held that statutory service must follow the mode designated by the statute; application of the maxim expression unius est exclusion alterium supports that notices dispatched to the husband's email (unavailable due to his illness) did not constitute valid service on the assessee whose own email was on record. Consequence: deficiency in service vitiates the penalty; penalty set aside and appeal allowed. - ITAT
Whether penalty under section 272A(1)(d) could be sustained where statutory notices under section 142(1) were served to an email ID other than the assessee's registered email. Held that statutory service must follow the mode designated by the statute; application of the maxim expression unius est exclusion alterium supports that notices dispatched to the husband's email (unavailable due to his illness) did not constitute valid service on the assessee whose own email was on record. Consequence: deficiency in service vitiates the penalty; penalty set aside and appeal allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
