Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Whether properties may be attached as "proceeds of crime":...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinvestigation required
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Whether properties may be attached as "proceeds of crime": applying the statutory definition's second limb and precedent, the tribunal held that the value of property equivalent to tainted proceeds may be attached where proceeds cannot be traced to specific assets; outcome - attachment of equivalent-value properties upheld. Whether there was reason to believe for PAO and confirmation: on evidence of fraudulent bank loans supported by documents and outstanding defalcations, the tribunal found sufficient reason to believe likelihood of concealment; outcome - PAO and confirmation sustained against the appellants. Whether ED must independently reinvestigate predicate offences: ED may rely on police/CBI probe and point out lacunae but cannot re-decide predicate guilt or quantum; outcome - no independent ED investigation required. - AT
Whether properties may be attached as "proceeds of crime": applying the statutory definition's second limb and precedent, the tribunal held that the value of property equivalent to tainted proceeds may be attached where proceeds cannot be traced to specific assets; outcome - attachment of equivalent-value properties upheld. Whether there was reason to believe for PAO and confirmation: on evidence of fraudulent bank loans supported by documents and outstanding defalcations, the tribunal found sufficient reason to believe likelihood of concealment; outcome - PAO and confirmation sustained against the appellants. Whether ED must independently reinvestigate predicate offences: ED may rely on police/CBI probe and point out lacunae but cannot re-decide predicate guilt or quantum; outcome - no independent ED investigation required. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.