Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
The principal issue was whether provisional attachment of corporate properties was lawful as proceeds of crime were allegedly injected into the company via purchase of share warrants, subsequent conversion to equity, and loans routed through NBFCs controlled by the accused. The tribunal relied on detailed factual money-trail in the original complaint identifying extensive related entities and payments (including an additional payment of Rs. 39.75 crores) and found loans, even if repaid, originated from tainted funds; consequently the attachment was lawful and the appeals were dismissed. - AT
The principal issue was whether provisional attachment of corporate properties was lawful as proceeds of crime were allegedly injected into the company via purchase of share warrants, subsequent conversion to equity, and loans routed through NBFCs controlled by the accused. The tribunal relied on detailed factual money-trail in the original complaint identifying extensive related entities and payments (including an additional payment of Rs. 39.75 crores) and found loans, even if repaid, originated from tainted funds; consequently the attachment was lawful and the appeals were dismissed. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.