Limitation period commencement and procedural inquiry rules: identity-based limitation upheld; complaints by authorised public servants need not attra...
Pre-trial bail granted where custodial period, documentary prosecution, and magistrate-triable offence favor release subject to surety and no witness ...
Allowability of Salary Exemptions: Form 16 entries can substantiate HRA and other salary exemptions, and home loan interest is deductible for a self-o...
The principal issue was whether provisional attachment of corporate properties was lawful as proceeds of crime were allegedly injected into the company via purchase of share warrants, subsequent conversion to equity, and loans routed through NBFCs controlled by the accused. The tribunal relied on detailed factual money-trail in the original complaint identifying extensive related entities and payments (including an additional payment of Rs. 39.75 crores) and found loans, even if repaid, originated from tainted funds; consequently the attachment was lawful and the appeals were dismissed. - AT
The principal issue was whether provisional attachment of corporate properties was lawful as proceeds of crime were allegedly injected into the company via purchase of share warrants, subsequent conversion to equity, and loans routed through NBFCs controlled by the accused. The tribunal relied on detailed factual money-trail in the original complaint identifying extensive related entities and payments (including an additional payment of Rs. 39.75 crores) and found loans, even if repaid, originated from tainted funds; consequently the attachment was lawful and the appeals were dismissed. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.