Person chargeable with duty must be the importer at importation; subsequent purchasers cannot be held liable where beneficial owner rules did not appl...
The principal issue was whether provisional attachment of corporate properties was lawful as proceeds of crime were allegedly injected into the company via purchase of share warrants, subsequent conversion to equity, and loans routed through NBFCs controlled by the accused. The tribunal relied on detailed factual money-trail in the original complaint identifying extensive related entities and payments (including an additional payment of Rs. 39.75 crores) and found loans, even if repaid, originated from tainted funds; consequently the attachment was lawful and the appeals were dismissed. - AT
The principal issue was whether provisional attachment of corporate properties was lawful as proceeds of crime were allegedly injected into the company via purchase of share warrants, subsequent conversion to equity, and loans routed through NBFCs controlled by the accused. The tribunal relied on detailed factual money-trail in the original complaint identifying extensive related entities and payments (including an additional payment of Rs. 39.75 crores) and found loans, even if repaid, originated from tainted funds; consequently the attachment was lawful and the appeals were dismissed. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
