Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Whether proceedings could continue against the successful resolution applicant after approval of a resolution plan: relying on Supreme Court precedent that once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31(1) all claims not included in the plan are extinguished, the court held that pending adjudication of such claims cannot be continued; accordingly statutory moratorium's purpose prevents revival of excluded claims and even applications for reinstatement without back wages are barred - consequence: the labour and tribunal proceedings were terminated and impugned orders were quashed, and the petitions were allowed. - HC
Whether proceedings could continue against the successful resolution applicant after approval of a resolution plan: relying on Supreme Court precedent that once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31(1) all claims not included in the plan are extinguished, the court held that pending adjudication of such claims cannot be continued; accordingly statutory moratorium's purpose prevents revival of excluded claims and even applications for reinstatement without back wages are barred - consequence: the labour and tribunal proceedings were terminated and impugned orders were quashed, and the petitions were allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.