Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Petition challenged the validity of government notifications and an order under section 73 of the CGST Act; Court held the principal issue was availability of an alternate remedy and directed relegation to statutory appeal against the order dated 26 June 2024, permitting all substantive grounds to be raised on merits - outcome: petition dismissed and appellants relegated to appeal. The Court further held that if the appeal succeeds, challenge to the notifications will be unnecessary, but if the appeal fails, liberty to challenge the notifications is preserved. - HC
Petition challenged the validity of government notifications and an order under section 73 of the CGST Act; Court held the principal issue was availability of an alternate remedy and directed relegation to statutory appeal against the order dated 26 June 2024, permitting all substantive grounds to be raised on merits - outcome: petition dismissed and appellants relegated to appeal. The Court further held that if the appeal succeeds, challenge to the notifications will be unnecessary, but if the appeal fails, liberty to challenge the notifications is preserved. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
