Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5761 to 5780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The central issue was whether initiation of CIRP under Section 7 failed because the alleged debt arose from an oral agreement. The tribunal held that documentary evidence - balance-sheet entries, interest accruals as per the cited agreement, TDS Form-16A and the respondent's own admissions recorded in the impugned order - establish existence of debt and default; therefore the oral-agreement contention is unsustainable. Consequence: the admission of the Section 7 application and initiation of CIRP is upheld and the appeal is dismissed. - NCLAT
The central issue was whether initiation of CIRP under Section 7 failed because the alleged debt arose from an oral agreement. The tribunal held that documentary evidence - balance-sheet entries, interest accruals as per the cited agreement, TDS Form-16A and the respondent's own admissions recorded in the impugned order - establish existence of debt and default; therefore the oral-agreement contention is unsustainable. Consequence: the admission of the Section 7 application and initiation of CIRP is upheld and the appeal is dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.