Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Petitioner's failure to rectify discrepant GSTR-1 entries within the prescribed rectification window (deadline 20.10.2020) meant the short payment of CGST and SGST was recoverable under Section 73(9); the Assessing Officer's tax demand of Rs. 4,38,566 with interest and penalty was upheld. Excess availment of Input Tax Credit beyond GSTR-2A (Rs. 11,374) constituted wrongful ITC, warranting penalty which was imposed after deposit. The writ was dismissed and the recovery proceedings sustained. - HC
Petitioner's failure to rectify discrepant GSTR-1 entries within the prescribed rectification window (deadline 20.10.2020) meant the short payment of CGST and SGST was recoverable under Section 73(9); the Assessing Officer's tax demand of Rs. 4,38,566 with interest and penalty was upheld. Excess availment of Input Tax Credit beyond GSTR-2A (Rs. 11,374) constituted wrongful ITC, warranting penalty which was imposed after deposit. The writ was dismissed and the recovery proceedings sustained. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.