Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Petitioner's failure to rectify discrepant GSTR-1 entries within the prescribed rectification window (deadline 20.10.2020) meant the short payment of CGST and SGST was recoverable under Section 73(9); the Assessing Officer's tax demand of Rs. 4,38,566 with interest and penalty was upheld. Excess availment of Input Tax Credit beyond GSTR-2A (Rs. 11,374) constituted wrongful ITC, warranting penalty which was imposed after deposit. The writ was dismissed and the recovery proceedings sustained. - HC
Petitioner's failure to rectify discrepant GSTR-1 entries within the prescribed rectification window (deadline 20.10.2020) meant the short payment of CGST and SGST was recoverable under Section 73(9); the Assessing Officer's tax demand of Rs. 4,38,566 with interest and penalty was upheld. Excess availment of Input Tax Credit beyond GSTR-2A (Rs. 11,374) constituted wrongful ITC, warranting penalty which was imposed after deposit. The writ was dismissed and the recovery proceedings sustained. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.