Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
The dominant issue is whether delay in filing Form No.10-IC, necessary to claim the concessional tax rate under Section 115BAA, can be condoned under Section 119(2)(b). The court held that Section 119(2)(b) empowers the CBDT (and its delegate) to condone such delay, relying on analogous High Court decisions; because non-condonation would extinguish the petitioner's substantive right to the Section 115BAA benefit and the petitioner demonstrated genuine hardship, the impugned refusal was quashed and the delay in filing Form No.10-IC was condoned. - HC
The dominant issue is whether delay in filing Form No.10-IC, necessary to claim the concessional tax rate under Section 115BAA, can be condoned under Section 119(2)(b). The court held that Section 119(2)(b) empowers the CBDT (and its delegate) to condone such delay, relying on analogous High Court decisions; because non-condonation would extinguish the petitioner's substantive right to the Section 115BAA benefit and the petitioner demonstrated genuine hardship, the impugned refusal was quashed and the delay in filing Form No.10-IC was condoned. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
