Classification of imported salvaged shaft pieces as ship parts confirmed, reassessment time-barred and appeal allowed restoring original classificatio...
Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Whether software acquired/held by the taxpayer qualifies for depreciation at 60% as an intangible asset: Tribunal applied precedent holding that software-even if developed in-house to meet proprietary requirements-falls within the statutory definition of intangible asset attractant of higher block rate, relying on prior authority establishing 60% allowance; accordingly the lower authorities' restriction to 25% was reversed and depreciation at 60% was allowed, resulting in allowance of the appeal. - ITAT
Whether software acquired/held by the taxpayer qualifies for depreciation at 60% as an intangible asset: Tribunal applied precedent holding that software-even if developed in-house to meet proprietary requirements-falls within the statutory definition of intangible asset attractant of higher block rate, relying on prior authority establishing 60% allowance; accordingly the lower authorities' restriction to 25% was reversed and depreciation at 60% was allowed, resulting in allowance of the appeal. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.