Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Whether software acquired/held by the taxpayer qualifies for depreciation at 60% as an intangible asset: Tribunal applied precedent holding that software-even if developed in-house to meet proprietary requirements-falls within the statutory definition of intangible asset attractant of higher block rate, relying on prior authority establishing 60% allowance; accordingly the lower authorities' restriction to 25% was reversed and depreciation at 60% was allowed, resulting in allowance of the appeal. - ITAT
Whether software acquired/held by the taxpayer qualifies for depreciation at 60% as an intangible asset: Tribunal applied precedent holding that software-even if developed in-house to meet proprietary requirements-falls within the statutory definition of intangible asset attractant of higher block rate, relying on prior authority establishing 60% allowance; accordingly the lower authorities' restriction to 25% was reversed and depreciation at 60% was allowed, resulting in allowance of the appeal. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.