Deductibility for charitable donations affirmed where payments to approved relief funds, even if CSR-driven, qualify under the donation deduction sche...
Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
Whether software acquired/held by the taxpayer qualifies for depreciation at 60% as an intangible asset: Tribunal applied precedent holding that software-even if developed in-house to meet proprietary requirements-falls within the statutory definition of intangible asset attractant of higher block rate, relying on prior authority establishing 60% allowance; accordingly the lower authorities' restriction to 25% was reversed and depreciation at 60% was allowed, resulting in allowance of the appeal. - ITAT
Whether software acquired/held by the taxpayer qualifies for depreciation at 60% as an intangible asset: Tribunal applied precedent holding that software-even if developed in-house to meet proprietary requirements-falls within the statutory definition of intangible asset attractant of higher block rate, relying on prior authority establishing 60% allowance; accordingly the lower authorities' restriction to 25% was reversed and depreciation at 60% was allowed, resulting in allowance of the appeal. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.