Expenses for overseas film shooting treated as services availed outside India, so no reverse charge service tax liability; cenvat reversals and penalt...
Electricity consumptionbased clandestine production estimates under the repealed Central Excise Act found insufficient; demand quashed and appeals all...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6561 to 6580 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(ii) was held impermissible because the assessee established availability of surplus own funds for making investments yielding exempt income; hence no interest disallowance could be attributed to such investments, and the disallowance was deleted. Disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was held untenable absent the AO's recorded objective satisfaction, as mandated by s.14A and settled law; the direction to recompute based on proper satisfaction was sustained. Sales tax and power subsidies were treated as capital receipts since the dominant purpose was industrial development and employment generation; addition to book profit u/s 115JB was rejected. Additional depreciation and bad-debt write-off/provision treatment (including under MAT) were allowed, and carry-forward of amalgamating company's LTC loss was upheld per the approved amalgamation scheme, resulting in dismissal of Revenue's grounds and partial dismissal of assessee's appeal. - ITAT
Disallowance under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(ii) was held impermissible because the assessee established availability of surplus own funds for making investments yielding exempt income; hence no interest disallowance could be attributed to such investments, and the disallowance was deleted. Disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was held untenable absent the AO's recorded objective satisfaction, as mandated by s.14A and settled law; the direction to recompute based on proper satisfaction was sustained. Sales tax and power subsidies were treated as capital receipts since the dominant purpose was industrial development and employment generation; addition to book profit u/s 115JB was rejected. Additional depreciation and bad-debt write-off/provision treatment (including under MAT) were allowed, and carry-forward of amalgamating company's LTC loss was upheld per the approved amalgamation scheme, resulting in dismissal of Revenue's grounds and partial dismissal of assessee's appeal. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
