Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(ii) was held impermissible because the assessee established availability of surplus own funds for making investments yielding exempt income; hence no interest disallowance could be attributed to such investments, and the disallowance was deleted. Disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was held untenable absent the AO's recorded objective satisfaction, as mandated by s.14A and settled law; the direction to recompute based on proper satisfaction was sustained. Sales tax and power subsidies were treated as capital receipts since the dominant purpose was industrial development and employment generation; addition to book profit u/s 115JB was rejected. Additional depreciation and bad-debt write-off/provision treatment (including under MAT) were allowed, and carry-forward of amalgamating company's LTC loss was upheld per the approved amalgamation scheme, resulting in dismissal of Revenue's grounds and partial dismissal of assessee's appeal. - ITAT
Disallowance under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(ii) was held impermissible because the assessee established availability of surplus own funds for making investments yielding exempt income; hence no interest disallowance could be attributed to such investments, and the disallowance was deleted. Disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) was held untenable absent the AO's recorded objective satisfaction, as mandated by s.14A and settled law; the direction to recompute based on proper satisfaction was sustained. Sales tax and power subsidies were treated as capital receipts since the dominant purpose was industrial development and employment generation; addition to book profit u/s 115JB was rejected. Additional depreciation and bad-debt write-off/provision treatment (including under MAT) were allowed, and carry-forward of amalgamating company's LTC loss was upheld per the approved amalgamation scheme, resulting in dismissal of Revenue's grounds and partial dismissal of assessee's appeal. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
