Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Addition under s.69 for alleged unexplained investment by a non-resident in its Indian subsidiary was held unsustainable where the investment was recorded in the assessee's books and its nature and source were explained as equity funding received from its foreign parent and onward invested in India, supported by bank statements and audited accounts. Section 69 applies only to investments not recorded in the books and lacking satisfactory explanation; insisting on further source proof despite recorded entries was a misapplication of the provision. The matter was remitted only for limited verification of annual accounts evidencing the parent funding, with a direction to delete the addition if verified, and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Addition under s.69 for alleged unexplained investment by a non-resident in its Indian subsidiary was held unsustainable where the investment was recorded in the assessee's books and its nature and source were explained as equity funding received from its foreign parent and onward invested in India, supported by bank statements and audited accounts. Section 69 applies only to investments not recorded in the books and lacking satisfactory explanation; insisting on further source proof despite recorded entries was a misapplication of the provision. The matter was remitted only for limited verification of annual accounts evidencing the parent funding, with a direction to delete the addition if verified, and the appeal was allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
