Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether EPF authorities could initiate/continue assessment under ss. 7A, 7Q and 14B of the EPF Act and raise consequent demands during the s. 14 IBC moratorium, and thereafter enforce such dues against the successful resolution applicant, was decided. The tribunal held that once CIRP commences, moratorium bars initiation or continuation of assessment proceedings that fasten pecuniary liability on the corporate debtor; any demand founded on inspections/assessments undertaken and concluded during moratorium, and not lodged as a claim in CIRP, cannot be enforced even through post-plan notices or summons. Accordingly, the impugned EPF demands were set aside, the successful resolution applicant's appeal was allowed to that extent, and the EPF authority's cross-appeal seeking priority was rejected - NCLAT
Whether EPF authorities could initiate/continue assessment under ss. 7A, 7Q and 14B of the EPF Act and raise consequent demands during the s. 14 IBC moratorium, and thereafter enforce such dues against the successful resolution applicant, was decided. The tribunal held that once CIRP commences, moratorium bars initiation or continuation of assessment proceedings that fasten pecuniary liability on the corporate debtor; any demand founded on inspections/assessments undertaken and concluded during moratorium, and not lodged as a claim in CIRP, cannot be enforced even through post-plan notices or summons. Accordingly, the impugned EPF demands were set aside, the successful resolution applicant's appeal was allowed to that extent, and the EPF authority's cross-appeal seeking priority was rejected - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
