Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6221 to 6240 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Issue was whether a creditor could, through an application under s.60(5) IBC, revive a rejected financial claim filed beyond the stipulated period and challenge the rejection after substantial progress of CIRP. Although the record showed acknowledgment of liability in the corporate debtor's balance sheets and emails, and even admissions by a promoter/personal guarantor in parallel insolvency proceedings, the challenge to the RP's rejection was raised nearly a year later, by which time the CoC had approved a resolution plan awaiting adjudication. Reopening or restarting CIRP at that stage was held impermissible; the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Issue was whether a creditor could, through an application under s.60(5) IBC, revive a rejected financial claim filed beyond the stipulated period and challenge the rejection after substantial progress of CIRP. Although the record showed acknowledgment of liability in the corporate debtor's balance sheets and emails, and even admissions by a promoter/personal guarantor in parallel insolvency proceedings, the challenge to the RP's rejection was raised nearly a year later, by which time the CoC had approved a resolution plan awaiting adjudication. Reopening or restarting CIRP at that stage was held impermissible; the appeal was dismissed. - NCLAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
