Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 95999 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Blocking of the taxpayer's electronic credit ledger under the CGST regime was held impermissible once the statutory one-year period from the date of blocking had expired; since the period had long elapsed, the authorities were directed to withdraw the blockage forthwith. Separately, noting prior judicial intervention in similar challenges to the competence of an investigating officer to initiate adjudication and the grant of protective interim relief, the court restrained the GST authorities from taking coercive steps on the basis of the impugned adjudication order until the returnable date. - HC
Blocking of the taxpayer's electronic credit ledger under the CGST regime was held impermissible once the statutory one-year period from the date of blocking had expired; since the period had long elapsed, the authorities were directed to withdraw the blockage forthwith. Separately, noting prior judicial intervention in similar challenges to the competence of an investigating officer to initiate adjudication and the grant of protective interim relief, the court restrained the GST authorities from taking coercive steps on the basis of the impugned adjudication order until the returnable date. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.