Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22) into a single composite show cause notice under ss. 73/74 of the CGST/KGST Act for reversal of input tax credit was held invalid, as such bunching had already been declared illegal in an earlier binding decision. Since the proceedings were founded on an impermissible consolidated notice, the consequential adjudication order could not survive. The composite show cause notice and the ensuing order were quashed, and the respondent was directed to drop the proceedings; the petition was allowed. - HC
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22) into a single composite show cause notice under ss. 73/74 of the CGST/KGST Act for reversal of input tax credit was held invalid, as such bunching had already been declared illegal in an earlier binding decision. Since the proceedings were founded on an impermissible consolidated notice, the consequential adjudication order could not survive. The composite show cause notice and the ensuing order were quashed, and the respondent was directed to drop the proceedings; the petition was allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
