Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22) into a single composite show cause notice under ss. 73/74 of the CGST/KGST Act for reversal of input tax credit was held invalid, as such bunching had already been declared illegal in an earlier binding decision. Since the proceedings were founded on an impermissible consolidated notice, the consequential adjudication order could not survive. The composite show cause notice and the ensuing order were quashed, and the respondent was directed to drop the proceedings; the petition was allowed. - HC
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22) into a single composite show cause notice under ss. 73/74 of the CGST/KGST Act for reversal of input tax credit was held invalid, as such bunching had already been declared illegal in an earlier binding decision. Since the proceedings were founded on an impermissible consolidated notice, the consequential adjudication order could not survive. The composite show cause notice and the ensuing order were quashed, and the respondent was directed to drop the proceedings; the petition was allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
