Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22) into a single composite show cause notice under ss. 73/74 of the CGST/KGST Act for reversal of input tax credit was held invalid, as such bunching had already been declared illegal in an earlier binding decision. Since the proceedings were founded on an impermissible consolidated notice, the consequential adjudication order could not survive. The composite show cause notice and the ensuing order were quashed, and the respondent was directed to drop the proceedings; the petition was allowed. - HC
Clubbing multiple tax periods/financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22) into a single composite show cause notice under ss. 73/74 of the CGST/KGST Act for reversal of input tax credit was held invalid, as such bunching had already been declared illegal in an earlier binding decision. Since the proceedings were founded on an impermissible consolidated notice, the consequential adjudication order could not survive. The composite show cause notice and the ensuing order were quashed, and the respondent was directed to drop the proceedings; the petition was allowed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
